No to Hartwells Student Build
Contact the author of the petition
This discussion topic has been automatically created of petition No to Hartwells Student Build.
|
modernmilly |
#12014-05-09 16:38This land is obviously going to be developed but Bath desperately needs more housing for young buyers rather than more student accommodation |
|
| |
|
MikeCB |
#2 Too big and in the wrong place2014-05-10 06:28Students are a very positive part of life in Bath, but this development is just far too big and in the wrong place. A residential development done in partnership with the surrounding community does seem like a better option for this site. Also I would love to see a linear park with pedestrian and cycle paths. |
|
| |
|
@Al_prof |
#32014-05-10 12:04I agree with both comments. I am a University Professor and definitely pro-student. But I know from other Uni developments all around the country that town vs gown friction always results when high density student housing is (especially from the "for profit" sector of housing owners) is plonked in the middle of a residential district. I am also angered at the lack of consultation. When you look at the plans you can see from the surrounding property that the pictures are based on drawings from two years ago. So why have they only consulted now in the same month they plan to put the planning application in? |
|
| |
|
Achilles |
#4 Hartwell's Student Build2014-05-10 12:56I also believe that new build should be for the residents of Bath. The young people of the city need good, affordable housing but this proposal is aimed at a transient population who will have no real stake in the community. Both Universities have plenty of their own land that they could use for new student accommodation. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#52014-05-10 13:26This development is just too large for the area which has relatively limited local amenities. Far better for the site to be used for a private residential development. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#62014-05-10 16:24We already have problems with RUH staff parking in Newbridge Road plus parents parking in order to deliver their children to the local school. Children also cross the road outside Hartwells, quite often running ahead of their parents - an accident waiting to happen! |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#72014-05-10 18:02The lack of a full and proper consultation period is deplorable. This appears to be a very high density student accommodation with a poor bedroom to parking ratio in a residential area. This site should be used to develop more affordable housing within Bath. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#82014-05-10 18:30This is a ridiculous spot for housing 500 students. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#92014-05-11 07:27I think it is important for residents and for parents of children at Newbridge School to be consulted fully on this. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#102014-05-11 18:48It is an ill thought out scheme for such a residential area. Local residents already have difficulty parking because of parents and teachers going to Newbridge Primary School and also nurses and patients going to the Royal United Hospital. Some Very often parking ALL DAY. There will be noise and vandalism from "some students" during the night and early morning when returning from nightclubs. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#112014-05-11 19:01This proposal has not been very well thought out for such a residential area and should be scrapped. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#122014-05-11 19:28To propose a site for 400+ students in the middle of a residential area miles away from uni facilities and the type of amenities students require (supermarket/night clubs/library?) is unsuitable for all concerned. Aside from the issues already mentioned (parking/volume of beds), if this scheme were successful it would no doubt over time lead to the degredation of the area through a general increase in student population via private lettings as has happened in large parts of Oldfield Park. Residential or possibly mixed commercial/residential is a far more appropriate use. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#132014-05-11 20:06The proposed plan would be disastrous for the area. This area is already congested with parking from the hospital and the school. The proposed plan does not provide sufficient parking for the students, and it is ludicrous to suggest that students will not bring cars with them, when the site is located so far from the university or from any of the amenities that they would need. Furthermore, the houses in the area would begin to convert to student lets, the parking pressure would be increased again and the area would begin to lose value and desirability. |
|
| |
|
tim |
#14 a good scheme2014-05-11 20:19When you think of the alternatives, a supermarket, houses etc, then I actuallyvthink that the student build is pretty good. They are thebonly category of tennants where yih can enforce a no car rules, they would help support the shops on Chelsea Road and, unlike houses for sale they would not put any furthervpressure on places at Newbridge School. The slopjng site is ideally suited to multistory buildings which would allow high density and yet not obscure anyones views. Face it, this land will get build on sooner or later, if this scheme falls the alternatives could be a lit worse. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#15 Re: a good scheme2014-05-11 20:35400-500 students in a residential district or 50 affordable houses (with a parking space each) for the next generation of permanent residents? You choose! Also, if this is a private "for profit" student accommodation, how can anyone legally enforce no cars? (its not like its on campus). WASPS (another good school in the district) is going to 3 form entry, so not sure argument about school places is that crucial. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#162014-05-11 20:35To propose a site for 400+ students in the middle of a residential area miles away from uni facilities and the type of amenities students require (supermarket/night clubs/library?) is unsuitable for all concerned. Aside from the issues already mentioned (parking/volume of beds), if this scheme were successful it would no doubt over time lead to the degredation of the area through a general increase in student population via private lettings as has happened in large parts of Oldfield Park. Residential or possibly mixed commercial/residential is a far more appropriate use. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#172014-05-12 08:02With the need for more residential housing in Bath and the preference for using brown field sites rather than green field makes this site a prime candidate for new low cost housing for Bath's younger generations. The proposal to build accommodation for 500 students on this site is ridiculous with it being far too large and in the wrong place. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#182014-05-12 15:45I think the location of this site so close to our school will actually make it even more like running the gauntlet for the kids going to and from. I don't think the area could effectively cope with such a large development. Far more suited to residential development. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#192014-05-12 15:53Parking and traffic congestion problems will have a huge effect on travelling to and from Bath |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#202014-05-13 07:43A quiet residential street cannot absorb 450 students. There are no amenities - how would this many people gain access to the services they need? A student campus like this should be on University grounds, not in a residential area. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#212014-05-13 07:56No thought has been given to the residents currently living in the area and the impact this will have on them. The noise level will be very high when you have such a high number of students in one small area and the bus infrastructure does not allow for a high volume of students catching the bus! |
|
| |
|
Pam |
#22 Too Many Students For The Proposed Site2014-05-13 08:28As per the other comments - too many people in such a small area would not work in many ways. What we need is more affordable houses to keep the community feel of the area. |
|
| |
|
Choose a nickname |
#23 Subject2014-05-13 11:40"WASPS (another good school in the district) is going to 3 form entry, so not sure argument about school places is that crucial." Actually, WASPs have been 3 form entry for some time. There is immense pressure on primary school places in the north west of the city already. Add this to the plan to build on Primrose Hill, and effectively, you are narrowing the school catchment to the families that can afford to live in the fairly expensive properties within close proximity to the two schools. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#242014-05-13 12:10The proposed development is too large for the space available. 85 car-parking spaces for 431 bedrooms is ludicrous and will lead to huge traffic and parking problems. A small residential development with self contained parking facilities is appropriate. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#252014-05-13 15:24The Newbridge area in Bath has a mixed community of young families, young professionals as well as a middle aged and elderly population. Chelsea Rd shops are ideal for this mix of families but will be drastically changed by the needs of large numbers of students. Parking is already difficult with 2 schools and RUH using the side roads. The number if people queuing for buses will potentially be dangerous on narrow pavements |
|
| |
|
Is there something you want to change?
Change doesn't happen by staying silent. The author of this petition stood up and took action. Will you do the same? Start a social movement by creating a petition.
Start a petition of your ownOther petitions you might be interested in
BAN SHROOMS FROM SMOKE SHOPS
1709 Created: 2026-02-20
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 1709 |
| 2026 | 1709 |
Sign if you would like to see Logansport Skate World and Fun Center to stay open.
853 Created: 2026-01-27
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 853 |
| 2026 | 853 |
CancelPianoPulse
21464 Created: 2026-01-16
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 21464 |
| 2026 | 21464 |
Bring the Original Dark Skies Back on a Streaming Service — and Let the Creators Continue the Story with New Programming
133 Created: 2026-02-25
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 133 |
| 2026 | 133 |
Bring Stray Kids: The Dominate Experience to theatres in South Africa
775 Created: 2026-01-16
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 775 |
| 2026 | 775 |
Close Bernard Isaacs Primary School Until Manqoba’s Mother Gets the Truth.
4433 Created: 2026-02-11
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 4433 |
| 2026 | 4433 |
LUNDEENS STOLE MY DOG/BRING CHEWBACCA MOSSET HOME
25 Created: 2026-02-14
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 25 |
| 2026 | 25 |
Wickliffe Schools Wrestling Team
24 Created: 2026-01-14
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 24 |
| 2026 | 24 |
Compassionate Release for Cortez Lamont Wooten
21 Created: 2026-02-25
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 21 |
| 2026 | 21 |
Keep DayZ 17+ ESRB rated
53 Created: 2026-01-07
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 53 |
| 2026 | 53 |
Impeach Trump and Bar Him From Holding Any Public Office
20 Created: 2026-01-28
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 20 |
| 2026 | 20 |
Howie Edelson, please change the Beach Boys Archival Projects mastering approach
36 Created: 2026-02-14
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 36 |
| 2026 | 36 |
TO DENY BAIL FOR A 59 YEARS OLD JEFFREY'S BAY WOMAN
997 Created: 2026-01-06
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 997 |
| 2026 | 997 |
A choice between septic or sewer
14 Created: 2026-01-26
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 14 |
| 2026 | 14 |
Request for Consideration: Lighting the Opera House in Solidarity with the People of Iran
1404 Created: 2026-01-11
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 1404 |
| 2026 | 1404 |
Second chance for students: Open NSFAS Late Applications for All students and Extend Appeal Window
285 Created: 2026-01-23
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 285 |
| 2026 | 285 |
Add Stats to AF3
36 Created: 2026-02-12
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 36 |
| 2026 | 36 |
Petition to keep Wally’s Dipstick Mechanic Service Open
11 Created: 2026-01-02
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 11 |
| 2026 | 11 |
Rename Powderhorn Park for Renee Good and Alex Pretti
10 Created: 2026-03-01
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 10 |
| 2026 | 10 |
Petition for School Closure Due to Severe Weather Conditions
10 Created: 2026-01-27
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 10 |
| 2026 | 10 |