Hands Off Hartlebury Common

#1524: - Re:

CAN YOU NOT OFFER CONSTRUCTIVE ARGUMENT?

TONY BARNETT

#1524: - Re:

"Very odd, a copy and paste of a post (#353) from June 29th 01:33

No new users on this site then?"

It's not very odd you tit, I thought it was a relevant post and placed it here.

Not very many new users at all, well done, 10/10, they only come here if;

a/ They get the address from the top of the petetion forms in the shops, which is unlikeley since they are signing to the aggrement anyway and do not have to come here therefore. Also, because we have reached a goal in siganatures, they are only being collected at a few high return places.

b/ People come here after meeting us on the common which we have not done for some time. If we wanted to, we could raise ten siganatures a day again, but whats the point now?, we have moved on and have different objectives.

At least on this site, the posts were diverse and genuine, rather than the handywork of about four people. Thanks for giving such a good show, you have not let us down

#1526: - Re: Re:

I was not offering an argument I was stating a fact.

#1527: Steve McCarron - VERY ODD?

'I thought it was a relevant post and placed it here'

I bet you put it there to look like a new post to try and bolster the idea that everyones scared of the cattle and have been 'banned' from the common because theyre scared. Otherwise youre just copy pasting your old posts.

'we have moved on and have different objectives.'

You objectives do seem to change a lot. What are they now?

#1529: - Re: Re: Re:

MAY BE SO, BUT WHY CAN'T YOU SAY SOMETHING CONSTRUCTIVE, WHERE WILL YOU BE WHEN WCC ATTEMPT TO CUT DOWN MORE TREES?

TONY

#1534: - Re: Re: Re: Re:  

#1535: - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

BUT I ASKED YOU WHAT YOU WILL DO, OR ARE YOU IN FAVOUR OF THE TREES COMING DOWN?

TONY

#1537: -

WELL, IDIOTS TOGETHER THEN

TONY

#1534: - Re: Re: Re: Re:

'MAY BE SO, BUT WHY CAN'T YOU SAY SOMETHING CONSTRUCTIVE, WHERE WILL YOU BE WHEN WCC ATTEMPT TO CUT DOWN MORE TREES?

TONY'

Ill probably be at work.

#1536: - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

'BUT I ASKED YOU WHAT YOU WILL DO, OR ARE YOU IN FAVOUR OF THE TREES COMING DOWN?

TONY'

Im in favour of SOME of the trees coming down.

(I didn't post at #1535)

#1540: - Re: Re: Re: VERY ODD?

can you be more objective?

#1544: - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

FAIR COMMENT, BUT THE TREES THAT HAVE COME DOWN ALREADY HAVE ROBBED MANY TYPES OF TREE DWELLERS OF HABITAT AND FOOD SOURCE,

IF THERE WAS A CONSENSUS OF OPINON BY THE PEOPLE OF THE UK AS A WHOLE, AND THEN THAT WAS SUBMITTED TOO THE MINISTER FOR CONSENT, AND THAT MINISTER INVOLVED ALL OF THE CONSERVATION BODIES TO INCLUDE THE SOIL CONSERVATION, YOU WOULD FIND THAT THE TREES WOULD STAY IN KEEPING WITH BIO DIVERSITY.

TONY

#1546: - Re: Re: Re: Re: VERY ODD?

CERTAINLY, THE OBJECTIVE IS TO REGAIN OUR HERITAGE, AND THAT IS OUR OPEN SPACES, IT IS EVERYONES BIRTH RIGHT TO ACCESS COMMON LANDS FREELY, IT IS ALSO OUR RIGHTS TO CHALLENGE CORRUPT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.

YOU MAY BE IN FAVOUR OF WHAT WCC ARE DOING, BUT, HAVE YOU CHECKED TO SEE IF THEY ARE ACTING WITHIN THE LAW?

TONY

#1548: - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VERY ODD?

I SEEM TO HAVE ANSWERED THE CRITICS, DOES THAT MEAN THEN THAT ALL EFFORTS WILL BE MADE TO PREVENT WCC FROM CARRYING OUT THEIR FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES?

TONY

#1549: - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VERY ODD?

clearly no, nobody cares anymore now the cows are on