Hands Off Hartlebury Common

#148: - Re: Re: Re: Re:

It will be a lot more than 200, and as we say to all signatories this is only one part of a much more substantial campaign. You are either working for the council or are deluded, the overall ratio is 450-1 against, do you live in hartlebury, would you like to meet me in the morning to hear what the public think?

We were at the common main entrance today from 1.00 pm to 2.30 pm

#146: - Re: Re: sanity in our open spaces

It will be a lot more than 200, and as we say to all signatories this is only one part of a much more substantial campaign. You are either working for the council or are deluded, the overall ratio is 450-1 against, do you live in hartlebury, would you like to meet me in the morning to hear what the public think?

We were at the common main entrance today from 1.00 pm to 2.30 pm

#143: -

It will be a lot more than 200, and as we say to all signatories this is only one part of a much more substantial campaign. You are either working for the council or are deluded, the overall ratio is 450-1 against, do you live in hartlebury, would you like to meet me in the morning to hear what the public think?

We were at the common main entrance today from 1.00 pm to 2.30 pm

#146: - Re: Re: sanity in our open spaces

See you in the morning, I will have a flask of coffee to share, 7.30 onwards

love and peace, steve

#150: - Re: Re: sanity in our open spaces

Do you have anything to say about the councils so called consultative process? Funny you should question mine when theirs was  a fraudulent process, do you know anybody in hartlebury or stourport, please meet me in the morning!

#150: - Re: Re: sanity in our open spaces

Did the council ask people in the town centres?

#157: - Re: Re: Re: Re: sanity in our open spaces

I promise you, everything I have said is true, come to the court hearing and I will buy you a packet of chips and a pint afterwards

#159: -

Theres no aswering you is there? Yesterday we collected 200 valid, identifiable hand written signatures. Not one person we asked thought the scheme had any validity, in fact most were quite angry.

We will be at the main entrance this morning from 9.30 onwards. Come and see for yourself, you ask the public what they think. Is that good enough for you or are you going to persist in this moronic train of thought and continually send these inane messages. If you wanted to attract attention to your viewpoint, you certainley have done just that. Now when I talk to people at the common, this exchange of views comes up increasingly, as they have already visited this site now.

your a celebrity now but only on a comic stage. See you in a bit, bye, bye

#161: -

Yes it is, we were removing an illegal impediment, we were not even cautioned. The council is misleading the public The fencing therefore is misuse of public funds. We are all waiting for your reply.

4 pages of signatures today, where were you?

#171: - Re:

The fencing was missapropiation of public money anyway, what I and others did is nothing compared to that waste of money. When will you realise your views are counter to the VAST overwhelming opinion against you.

If you understood law, which you clearley do not. I was entitled to and had an obligation as every commoner has to remove this illegal impediment and force wcc to restore the common to its original pre management condition.