Friends of Thorpe Woodlands - petition against proposal to build 300 houses over this Wildlife Site
Contact the author of the petition
This discussion topic has been automatically created of petition Friends of Thorpe Woodlands - petition against proposal to build 300 houses over this Wildlife Site.
|
Guest |
#12016-10-01 03:19I wholeheartedly disagree and condemn these proposals for 300 new houses. I live opposite these woods which was one of the main reasons we bought the house and would hate them to be built on. We already have enough traffic coming through Plumstead Road East as it is so we certainly don't need anymore. we don't need these houses as all sites have been allocated for housing in our area. Basically this is just a scheme by the developers and owners to make money. They don't care about all the wildlife and habitats that will be destroyed. We must keep these woods to offset the pollution that will be created by the housing developments without adding more unnecessarily. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#22016-10-01 05:30There is no need for the woods to built on, how can the owners say that destroying part of the woods would help wildlife. the information supplied by the owners is totally misleading, and the whole plan is being driven by greed. There is no need for these houses, as there are more than enough houses planned at other sites. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#32016-10-01 07:16I live near the woodland and see how much wonderful wildlife inhabits it. The council had already deemed this land unsuitable for development, and with plans for more houses on the land surrounding it on Salhouse Road, I think we really need to keep this as a green space and protect it as a county wildlife site. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#42016-10-01 07:17I used to live right by the woods and loved them. The charm of thorpe will be destroyed forever. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#52016-10-01 07:25I am massively opposed to this proposed development in these beautiful woods by selfish money grabbing persons. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#62016-10-01 07:38I'm signing this petition because I believe we have a responsibility to our natural environment, it's important and crucial for our well being, and because Thorpe Woodlands is a particularly valuable natural area on the edge of Norwich. The local area already has sufficient planned area for housing. There is also an integrated plan for maintaining a Green Infrastructure for the benefit of the environment and the people of Norwich. For a development company to then suggest, it's a wonderful idea to build in the middle of a this woodland County Wildlife Site is ludicrus. That nature, it's rare plant species, the woodland habitat will be improved by building a housing estate on it and disturbing and degrading the rest with heavy machinery, construction and access roads, is insane. The developers ironically named 'Socialy Conscious Capital' are ignoring the natural value of this site to Norwich, it's people, local democracy, local planning for a sutainable future. With no logical motive other than profit, this company seems to be suggesting that 'Norfolk Wildife Trust' sites would be better as housing estates. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#72016-10-01 07:39Have walked in these woods for 20 years. Thorpe needs green space. Children are brought to walk there too and it needs to be protected for future generations. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#82016-10-01 08:26I am firmly against this development proposed for thorpe woods |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#92016-10-01 08:27Thorpe Woods are a precious part of the rapidly dwindling British woodland. To destroy even part of them at a time when we are being urged to create new areas of woodland would be extremely foolish. The developers have a reassuring, cosy name ('Socially Conscious...') which belies their record of destructive and selfish activities elsewhere. Their proposals for Thorpe Woodlands must be completely rejected. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#102016-10-01 08:37I support the need for more housing but not in woodland. New woods have been planted around the country so destroying an existing one is a retrograde step. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#112016-10-01 08:48It is quite outrageous that these developers persist despite the council, the public and wildlife authorities being against any development. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#122016-10-01 08:52This development has already been ruled out. Why are these people persisting? |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#132016-10-01 09:01Why wouldn't I? The council has said this land is not needed for building on. The owners resemble Tesco in their relentless, greedy approach. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#142016-10-01 09:12having been refused building permission in the past it seems that the developers will keep trying again and again until they are successful in spite of refusal and objection. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#152016-10-01 09:27I live adjacent to the woodland and have been privileged to witness an abundance of wildlife that changes along with the trees every season. We have construction coming at us from every point, the Blue Boar Lane works, the parcels of land along Salhouse road and we need a lung for the population and a safe retreat for the wildlife. Houses are not needed, woodland is... |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#162016-10-01 09:40Shocking that these developers are even applying again when the council has ruled against it. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#172016-10-01 10:51Building houses on this woodland nature reserve would be an environmental disaster, not only for the displaced wildlife but for us local residents who want clean air to breathe, which woodland trees provide. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#182016-10-01 11:19Because it is obvious to any sane minded person, that the area concerned, not only cannot sustain any such development ( schools, sewerage etc. etc ) , but the transport situation , is already busy ,most times of the day. Do they also propose to provide new doctors surgeries, and staff them , to help the already hopeless situation, in the area? I think not . This is a recreational area. Leave it that way!!! |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#192016-10-01 11:45"Socially Conscious Capital" are desperate to win-over the planning authorities. If they can't, they will have wasted a lot of time and money. If they can, they will make millions. This whole scheme is motivated purely by greed. None of those involved even need money - the landowners are massively wealthy, with the entire Walsingham Estate including Walsingham Abbey and 3 of the surrounding villages in their possession, plus hundreds of acres of woodland in Felthorpe, Drayton and Horsford, plus huge areas of woodland and agricultural land elsewhere in Norfolk. These people do not need more money. But like so many of the ultra-rich, they always want more. They will say whatever they think will help their cause and they are experts at seeming to be pleasant, genuine people. Do not trust them an inch. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#202016-10-01 12:59It is a mortal sin to convert established woodland into housing. There is plenty of other land away from the city to use without packing us in like sardines, stretching the resources and polluting us all the way to the hospital. We need to spread out more into the country and have a green and integrated transport system to enable movement. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#212016-10-01 13:07To preserve an area of natural ecology . If we diminish these areas we will be left with no insects to pollinate, no other fauna and flora, no trees which ultimately will reduce our ability to grow food and breath! |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#222016-10-01 14:30The woods and the wildlife must be protected. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#232016-10-01 14:33IF more houses are required, there are more suitable places to build them. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#242016-10-01 15:25We feel that any proposals to develop this area will be detrimental to wildlife and once lost there will be no going back. This wonderful green space will be gone forever. We neither want or need further housing in this area. |
|
| |
|
Guest |
#252016-10-01 15:26Because we don,t want to lose any more woodland |
|
| |
|
Is there something you want to change?
Change doesn't happen by staying silent. The author of this petition stood up and took action. Will you do the same? Start a social movement by creating a petition.
Start a petition of your ownOther petitions you might be interested in
BAN SHROOMS FROM SMOKE SHOPS
1709 Created: 2026-02-20
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 1709 |
| 2026 | 1709 |
Sign if you would like to see Logansport Skate World and Fun Center to stay open.
853 Created: 2026-01-27
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 853 |
| 2026 | 853 |
CancelPianoPulse
21465 Created: 2026-01-16
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 21465 |
| 2026 | 21465 |
Bring the Original Dark Skies Back on a Streaming Service — and Let the Creators Continue the Story with New Programming
135 Created: 2026-02-25
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 135 |
| 2026 | 135 |
Bring Stray Kids: The Dominate Experience to theatres in South Africa
775 Created: 2026-01-16
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 775 |
| 2026 | 775 |
Close Bernard Isaacs Primary School Until Manqoba’s Mother Gets the Truth.
4436 Created: 2026-02-11
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 4436 |
| 2026 | 4436 |
LUNDEENS STOLE MY DOG/BRING CHEWBACCA MOSSET HOME
25 Created: 2026-02-14
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 25 |
| 2026 | 25 |
Wickliffe Schools Wrestling Team
24 Created: 2026-01-14
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 24 |
| 2026 | 24 |
Compassionate Release for Cortez Lamont Wooten
22 Created: 2026-02-25
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 22 |
| 2026 | 22 |
Keep DayZ 17+ ESRB rated
53 Created: 2026-01-07
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 53 |
| 2026 | 53 |
Impeach Trump and Bar Him From Holding Any Public Office
20 Created: 2026-01-28
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 20 |
| 2026 | 20 |
Howie Edelson, please change the Beach Boys Archival Projects mastering approach
36 Created: 2026-02-14
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 36 |
| 2026 | 36 |
TO DENY BAIL FOR A 59 YEARS OLD JEFFREY'S BAY WOMAN
997 Created: 2026-01-06
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 997 |
| 2026 | 997 |
A choice between septic or sewer
14 Created: 2026-01-26
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 14 |
| 2026 | 14 |
Request for Consideration: Lighting the Opera House in Solidarity with the People of Iran
1404 Created: 2026-01-11
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 1404 |
| 2026 | 1404 |
Second chance for students: Open NSFAS Late Applications for All students and Extend Appeal Window
285 Created: 2026-01-23
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 285 |
| 2026 | 285 |
Add Stats to AF3
36 Created: 2026-02-12
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 36 |
| 2026 | 36 |
Petition to keep Wally’s Dipstick Mechanic Service Open
11 Created: 2026-01-02
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 11 |
| 2026 | 11 |
Rename Powderhorn Park for Renee Good and Alex Pretti
10 Created: 2026-03-01
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 10 |
| 2026 | 10 |
Petition for School Closure Due to Severe Weather Conditions
10 Created: 2026-01-27
| Time period | Number of signatures |
|---|---|
| All time | 10 |
| 2026 | 10 |