Say NO to Clarendon Park Residents Parking
Contact the author of the petition
This discussion topic has been automatically created of petition Say NO to Clarendon Park Residents Parking.
Guest |
#262016-01-17 07:57Why can't the council put the money to better use on a car park to help the local businesses, rather than kill them... |
Guest |
#272016-01-17 18:03I don't want to have to tell friends and family they or me will have to pay £1 just to come and visit me, ridiculous then there's also the issue who and how is this scheme going to be policed or monitored to stop those without permits parking in our streets anyway, what a short sighted way to deal with a parking problem. |
Guest |
#282016-01-17 18:06Just don't want this scheme as it will hurt the friendly feeling of the area and cause more problems than it will solve, typical council attitude charge the residents to park outside their own homes. |
Guest |
#312016-01-17 21:07Having friends that live in the west end that the permit scheme is a money making scheme for the council. Residents pay for their annual permits, if they have guests they have to purchase them a visitor iAds if staying longer than 2 hours.....ever had a dinner party with a few persons that drive, bye bye £10, £15....£20 !! I have also been advised that non permit holders still take the risk and park in the area taking up all the residents permit spaces. When approached by a resident they are apparently very hostile, still park as they know the proberbility of getting a parking ticket is very low. Please also note that I have been advised that there are only a maximum of 15 traffic wardens on duty at any one time for the whole of the city and suberbs.....how can they therefore enforce the permit scheme adequately, the truth is they can't. Oh and the traffic wardens are run by a private company and the office is closed during weekends and evenings; therefore you can't even call them should you wish to ask for a warden to visit your area due to non permit holders taking up all the spaces!!! The scheme is just a MASSIVE cash cow for the council and designed to pull the residents trousers down!!! |
Elkieb |
#32 Re:2016-01-17 21:28Agreed. We need permits! YES to residents parking! |
Guest |
#332016-01-17 21:35I do not believe that permits will solve the issue with lack of parking in Clarendon Park. I have struggled finding a space by my house during the day when there are commuters and students parked on the road. Likewise my husband could be unable to find a space first thing on a Sunday morning after returning from a night shift......no commuters or student just the level of car ownership. |
Guest |
#342016-01-17 21:47I've lived around clarendon park for over 15 years. My view is that the difficulty in parking is due to students bringing their cars with them to uni then never driving them, and using up parking spaces as a result. Would residents parking also apply to them? I think there has to be a better way to manage traffic in the area than by financially penalising residents who live there all year round. |
Guest |
#352016-01-17 22:33No one gets a guaranteed place, how does it make a difference? Just a tax on residents |
![]() Anonymous |
#362016-01-17 23:19Parking permits will not solve the issue and just drive the problem to other streets and harm local business. |
Guest |
#372016-01-18 11:06I am a nearby resident and use the streets for parking. Enforcing a scheme would be detrimental to my personal and professional life, as well as local businesses. |
Guest |
#38 Re: Re: Re:2016-01-18 20:27So why wouldn't you want a scheme that means we'd be able to park our cars in the day? |
Guest |
#392016-01-18 21:41Proposed scheme is a waste of money and a hassle for residents with cars |
Guest |
#402016-01-18 22:12I signed it because a residents' parking scheme will only make the situation worse. It wouldn't mean we could park in our own street as there are clearly more cars in a street than spaces and we wouldn't be able to park in neighbouring streets if they had a scheme in place. Could well end up parking a distance away. It will have have an adverse effect on the area in economic terms and make the area far less attractive as a place to live. Without the thriving shops the area will go down hill rapidly and it won't be the place we love to live. |
Guest |
#412016-01-21 09:30It is not the solution. It will affect far too many people in a bad way for the few that want to park right outside their houses |
Guest |
#422016-01-23 19:53Resident Parking will make more problems to the Clarendon Park area than solving them and it is not necessary. |
Bob |
#442016-01-25 10:24The council has repeatedly ignored requests for statistical justification and logistics on the proposal. It is I'll thought out, and rushed. The local residents have had little to no information delivered to them and all of which implies a stealth strategy to again force a change that can as yet be seen as nothing but a bad decision. On top of that we finally find out it is hardly democratic. There is only one vote per household and it does not reflect the electoral register. |
Guest |
#452016-01-25 23:23This parking scheme would drive people away from just popping by the fabulous independant CP. People won't want to pay for this parking, so won't come or they will end up fighting over the few visitors bays. Disastrous either way. Don't spoil CP - just leave it as it is and preserve it's charm . Residents live there knowing it is a congested area - they put up with it in favour of the whole ambience of the place. I used to live there for 3 years so I know. I visit regularly and would be very sad to see it change . |
Guest |
#462016-01-26 12:33Students already have to pay a ridiculous amount for tuition fees and expensive rent. Therefore to start charging for residence parking is completely ridiculous and unfair, the council and government do not sympathise for students in the slightest. |
Guest |
#472016-01-28 18:06Introducing residents permits in areas where it is not needed is a waste of money. It will only cause more problems not solutions and will be damaging for the Community. |
Guest |
#482016-02-02 22:12My daughter lives on Lytton Road and also has a small business in a separate studio there. The parking restrictions could adversely effect her business, possibly making it impossible to carry on if her customers were restricted in their parking. It would also effect us when we go down to visit her and her son. |
Guest |
#492016-02-02 22:16My daughter lives Lytton Road and it would effect us when we visit her. It would also adversely effect a lot of the small businesses around there. |
Guest |
#502016-02-11 15:58We have lived in our property for 13 years and we have never had a problem with parking, the opposite side of us have not been included so this is going to cause problems with our neighbours. Why create a problem when there isn't one!! |
|
Petition Against the Installation of a Biodigester at Wilson Rd, Fairfield Township, Madison County, Ohio
Bend to the Beach Road Initiative
Protect the pure breed Danish-Swedish farmdog from puppymills and inbreeding
Open Letter of scientists and entrepreneurs regarding MFF and FP10
Proclamation for a Restored Republic
PETITION OPPOSING ARROWHEAD AIRPARK IN CASS COUNTY MISSOURI
Richard Bong State Recreation Area Class 1 Dog Training Area Requested Change
Hardworking People Against AB 928
Wyandanch Warriors Vs Wyandanch Wolves
The adoption and ratification of a new calendar for the United Global Trade Organization
No Bail For Rob Evans #JusticeForVanessa
Is there something you want to change?
Change doesn't happen by staying silent. The author of this petition stood up and took action. Will you do the same? Start a social movement by creating a petition.
Start a petition of your ownOther petitions you might be interested in
Hardworking People Against AB 928
307 Created: 2025-06-19
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 307 |
30 days | 307 |
Richard Bong State Recreation Area Class 1 Dog Training Area Requested Change
311 Created: 2025-06-17
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 311 |
30 days | 311 |
Wyandanch Warriors Vs Wyandanch Wolves
84 Created: 2025-06-10
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 84 |
30 days | 84 |
Petition to Amend Lawton's I-4 Zoning Ordinance Verbiage
102 Created: 2024-03-14
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 102 |
30 days | 37 |
Let the Hill Be Great: A World Class Park That Lifts Up All of Southeast San Diego
20 Created: 2025-06-12
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 20 |
30 days | 20 |
Bring back "Julie and the Phantoms" for season 2
131 Created: 2025-02-11
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 131 |
30 days | 27 |
Justice For Cwecwe
1173359 Created: 2025-03-27
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 1173359 |
30 days | 504 |
Protect the pure breed Danish-Swedish farmdog from puppymills and inbreeding
15 Created: 2025-06-07
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 15 |
30 days | 15 |
Bend to the Beach Road Initiative
11 Created: 2025-06-24
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 11 |
30 days | 11 |
Life University Student Concerns Over New Attendance Policy
345 Created: 2025-05-28
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 345 |
30 days | 9 |
Request to Pope Leo XIV to restore the norms of Summorum Pontificum
1576 Created: 2025-06-04
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 1576 |
30 days | 1575 |
Medirest Staff Barnet Hospital Pay Rise increase for 15%
128 Created: 2025-06-20
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 128 |
30 days | 128 |
Élhetőbb gyermekkor Duchenne izomdisztrófiában
4656 Created: 2025-06-09
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 4656 |
30 days | 4656 |
Justice For Marlon Franklin
40 Created: 2024-10-14
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 40 |
30 days | 6 |
Unionville livestock ordinance text amendment
136 Created: 2025-05-20
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 136 |
30 days | 5 |
Stop Wes Moore, and his desperate power grab to change historic tag qualification's.
386 Created: 2025-05-22
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 386 |
30 days | 4 |
PETITION OPPOSING ARROWHEAD AIRPARK IN CASS COUNTY MISSOURI
177 Created: 2025-04-28
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 177 |
30 days | 3 |
Proclamation for a Restored Republic
88 Created: 2025-04-26
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 88 |
30 days | 3 |
Petition to Provo City Council In Opposition of a Waterpark at Slate Canyon
529 Created: 2025-04-23
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 529 |
30 days | 3 |
Make Armored Mud Balls a State "Sedimentary Structure"
459 Created: 2021-03-03
Time period | Number of signatures |
---|---|
All time | 459 |
30 days | 3 |